I apologize for those who received an RSS feed with the draft of this post. I don’t recall having scheduled it to post, but I must have. I fear you all got a glimpse into the working of my brain that reveals disjointed thoughts and flights of ideas. Some of you must wonder how I turn all of those thoughts into a cohesive blog entry.
I am still struggling with this entry topic. I thought perhaps it was because I am too emotionally invested, but last night I realized that is not entirely true. The problem with this topic is that I am not sure what I am writing about. The concepts of attachment, attachment parenting and attachment disorder are inadequately defined. The lack of a clear, agreed upon definitions makes using these concepts in psychological research problematic. Still, researchers and adoption experts have taken what is intuitive about creating a safe environment for an infant or young child and run amok with them. Further muddying the picture is that the same term is used by many different groups of people to mean completely different things. As my brain tried to get its mind around a concept, I realize my angst, anger and anxiety related to this topic does not really fit neatly into one easy idea. My thoughts became a flight of ideas.
I was naive when I adopted the first time. I had been raised in a stable, two parent home. Our home wasn’t touched by poverty or addiction. When I chose to adopt a waiting child from the US Foster Care system, I really didn’t understand what that would mean. I could verbalize that the children came from homes where their needs weren’t being met. I just didn’t understand. My eyes were open as I read the files of the little girls that the caseworkers hoped to place in my home. I didn’t understand until I read files little children left alone for days without food. I didn’t even understand what wrath meant until I read of a little girl who had killed a litter of cats. She had been placed in foster care when her biological mother chose to reunite with the man who had molested her.
I believe man is the crowning glory of God’s creation. Man is a triune being because he is an image bearer. Our children have a body, soul and spirit. And, prior to coming into our home, the child has likely been scarred in each of these areas. There bodies may have been physically abused. They may not have gotten adequate nutrition. Like Marissa, their brains may have been permanently damaged by prenatal exposure to alcohol. Like Beverly, lack of preventative medical care, may mean they area chronically ill.
Their soul is scarred too. Their imaginations and memories are often frightening. The child may have learned that wrong is right. They may have difficulty expression love and affection. Because the child’s understanding of the world remains affected by what they believe to be true, reasoning, even in neurotypical kids, can seem unreasonable.
Finally, many adopted children have learned to put their faith in, worship and revere something other than God. Long ago I made a commitment to God. It was made from the comfort of an easy life. Still, I find myself asking things like, if God is good and omnipotent, why would a child be born with fetal alcohol syndrome? Or to parents who don’t have the skills to raise a child? Why would he allow poverty to exist? They are questions I haven’t fully answered. And, a God who is presented in Scripture as a father may be hard to embrace for a child who has only known an abusive earthly father.
But, it seems that getting our minds around a triune human is no easier than getting our minds around a triune God. The idea is too big and too abstract to operationalize, by that I mean make it meaningful in our real life. Only those without children parent on a conceptual level. The rest of us need real life interventions and support. My training is as a registered nurse. A nursing diagnosis is far different than a medical diagnosis. Nursing diagnosis are based on functional status. For example, a doctor might diagnose a patient with a myocardial infarction (heart attack); the nursing diagnosis would include things like acute pain, activity intolerance and knowledge deficit. Is it professional bias to believe that a nursing diagnosis or identifying functional deficits are better than labeling a child whose life experience are abnormal with a diagnosis of Reactive Attachment Disorder?