I recently was tag surfing and came across a link to an article in the LA Times entitled Christian groups launch massive adoption campaign. During a three-day summit, Christian leaders from Focus on the Family, Campus Crusade, and Rick Warren (pastor of Saddleback Church and author of The Purpose Driven Life) pledged to devote church resources to helping needy children.
“We’ve got some people who only focus on moral purity and couldn’t care less about the poor, the sick, the uneducated. And they haven’t done zip for those people,” said Warren, a mega-church pastor in California and author of the best-selling “The Purpose-Driven Life.”
As I have journeyed further in my own Christian walk, I have become convinced that the modern church is wrong on a number of things. We argue endlessly about theology. We insist that what is most important is how a person thinks. Yet, the entire Old Testament is devoted to how someone in covenant with his or her Creator is supposed to act. I personally find it refreshing to see the church begin to become more involved in being the Body of Christ. But, I wonder, “Why is the emphasis on adopting needy children?”
Many of my readers know I am passionately pro-adoption. As a Christian and an adoptive mother, I am very concerned about the implications of stressing adoption as one of the things that Christians do. Adoption is not about evangelism or proving your spirituality. Adoption is about children.
I have been blessed by adoption. But, I would be naive if I didn’t understand that what has blessed me is a devastating loss on the part of my children. My children have all lost their first family, their culture, their heritage and their claim to a normal life. They are part of a transracial family. We stand out in a crowd. Even strangers will look at us and know that our kids entered our family through adoption. People that don’t know us will judge my children based upon their hidden assumptions about adoptees (and I would suspect about adopters too).
“When we hear about people working with cocaine babies in shelters, and are asked to support their efforts, it’s easy to write out a check. It’s nice to deal with the vision of an imaginary, cuddly baby. It’s not so easy to look at a child who’s screaming “NO!!” at the top of her lungs, has a dirty face, and is absolutely not adorable, cute, or cuddly and still want to help.” Kirsten L. Gordon, It Really Does Take a Village)
My children have all been hungry because of neglect or poverty. Beverly presented to the orphanage with Kwashiorkor. Early malnutrition has been shown to lower IQ. Marissa has fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. My children will face almost daily challenges of learning to cope with their life experiences. This will oftentimes be complicated by a myriad of medical and psychiatric diagnoses that make the process harder.
Beverly and David are still in Haiti. But, my experience parenting Marissa has demonstrated that the emotional work that she has to do is often expressed in behaviors that are viewed as unacceptable in our society. Dysregulated, neurologically-based activities are often identified as character defects — defiance, laziness, belligerence or willfulness. Some Christians believe in generational curses and make assumptions about Marissa based upon this presupposition. Some Christians equate all abnormal or “bad” behavior with sin. Most often, I am seen as the cause. I am not strict enough. I am too strict. If only I would spank her more, let her do the things that are age appropriate, send her to government school, get cable TV… etc., etc., etc. It really seems that many people have the expectation that if a child is placed in a “good” home and appropriately disciplined, behavior and emotional problems will magically disappear. In parenting Marissa, I have found little support and undersanding within the church.
I am also disturbed with the idea that Christian parents are going to “save the child.” When I decided to adopt, I had no intentions of saving a child. I wanted to be a mom. I am not a saint. I am not super-mom. I am just a woman who desired to have a child and found that I was inconceivable. I have heard adult adoptees complain about feeling that society expected that they should be grateful to their adoptive parents.
If the church is set on saving children, it should focus on the root cause of displaced children. The church shouldn’t focus on adopting children; it should focus on supporting parents. Adoption is really only a band-aid on the real problem of poverty and addiction. I believe God weeps every time a child is separated from his or her first mother and father.
Still, there are hundreds and thousands of children worldwide for which help has come to late. If you desire to adopt one (or more) of these children and provide them love and a home, you will be blessed. A child is a blessing no matter how he or she enters your home. But, adoption will cost you more than just the adoption fees. Are you prepared to bear the cost?
Hat Tip: Sandra











11 responses so far ↓
Bobbie // 20 May 2007 at 8:36 pm |
Seems they forgot it is Jesus that saves.Adoption isn’t like puppy rescue.
I loved reading your comment. My beloved retired an E-7 (He didn’t make E-8 because he would not attend nor sponsor nor contribute to a party to pay for an abortion for an Airman that was 7 1/2 months pregnant) Politics, you know…. But it was God’s plan because he became a pastor when he got out. In the Military he hardly had a Sunday off for Church.
I am sorry you lost your dad, I am glad he was so honored! Towns with Bases tend to know what is right to do.
Since your dad retired in Biloxi, did they get affected by Katrina? My Brother in Law and Mother in law live/lived there too. My MIL’s senior apt was on Beach Blyd. It did not survive she now lives in Ocean Springs, My BIL’s house was barely touched, tree limbs and a bent antenna.
I haven’t told you yet how much I LOVE Hind’s Feet on High Places. Have you read Mountain of Spices?
Because of Jesus, Bobbie
Linda L. // 20 May 2007 at 9:02 pm |
AMEN….I am amazed by your patience and fortitude. Marissa is blessed to have you as her mother. Of course you realize that we live in a culture that feels they have the answer to every dilemma a parent/parent’s have. You are very in tune to your daughter and how the Lord wants you to parent her.
Every time I see a child in need, my heart breaks. I’d love to adopt, but my husband knows my limits and would not permit it.
There are a lot of things that bother me about promoting adoption as a “cure” for these children or as a form of evangelism. Your points are strong, I appreciate the way you have shared.
In gratitude for you and your beautiful new blog,
Blessings,
Linda
Lori // 20 May 2007 at 9:14 pm |
I guess I agree and disagree with your article. It is certainly thought-provoking. We purposely adopted our children because we wanted to provide them with a loving Christian home, rather than letting them die in Ethiopia or perhaps have other, worse things happen to them. We did want to raise more children or we wouldn’t have added more to our family, but when times were absolutely the hardest, it was the realization that we were doing something we saw as essential for the souls of these children that kept us focused on the future rather than the frustrating, maddening present.
I do agree that adoption is such a loss for the children. My children lost not only their parents but then their grandparents who cared for them after they were orphaned, their older brother, their aunts and uncles, their village and their culture. I can’t even imagine being a mother who was as sick as their mother must have been, delivering those two precious babies, then dying a month later, knowing that their father was also ill. And when my son or daughter show abandonment issues, my heart hurts for what they went through to be hurt so much, so early.
I also agree with the idea that Christians need to be more proactive in helping the parents to be able to keep their children. I guess I see that as a possible avenue for people who don’t feel comfortable adopting but do feel led/enabled to help in other ways. There is a whole hurting world out there for us to help, depending on where our talents and skills lie.
But I foresee as much problem with adoption evangelism as I saw with the rash of international adoptions following the high-profile cases like that of Angelina Jolie.
Acceptance-with-Joy // 20 May 2007 at 10:10 pm |
Lori,
I am not sure we disagree at all. I have no problem with individual Christians being stirred by the Spirit to build their family through adoption.
I do have a huge problem with Christians being stirred by Rick Warren, James Dobson, Steve Douglass or an emotionally charged advertisement campaign to adopt a child for the sole purpose of evangelizing the child.
myderbe // 20 May 2007 at 11:04 pm |
Wow. A lot to think about. Thanks for your perspective.
I guess I think that raising up an adopted child in the nurture and admonition of the Lord would be a given for Christian parents. And I suppose if you think about some of these children growing up without ever hearing about Jesus, I can see how that would provoke some people to want to adopt. Of course, it makes more sense to me to have a heart for a whole village or town of people and take the Gospel to all of them instead of removing one or two children and bringing them home to hear the Gospel.
We’re told in James that true Christianity is taking care of widows and orphans. Showing Christ by loving those weakest and most incapable of caring for themselves. I suppose that’s evangelism if you think of evangelism as showing Christ to the world.
I am not really aware of the campaign for adoption of these famous Christian leaders. I’ll have to research that a little more.
Acceptance-with-Joy // 21 May 2007 at 6:46 am |
myderbe,
Thanks for you comment. I am not opposed to Christian parents adopting and raising the children who entered their home by adoption as Christians.
I am concerned in the unbalanced approach that came across in this article. Apparently, “Christian media will be saturated with stories and ads touting adoption and foster care as a scriptural imperative, an order direct from God.”
God doesn’t command us to adopt, He commands us to care for orphans and widows. I stand firm that the best way to do this is by supporting parents. This one-sided campaign speaks to me of ulterior motives. I don’t believe adopting a child should ever be about anything more than someone wanting to love a child.
Within the text of the article, there are quotations about placing a child in a home with a mom and dad… and proving the Christian concern for children extends beyond the womb. The author of this article, while putting these statements in quotation marks, did not reference the speaker and the quotes are obviously out of context, but the ideas are not unique to this article. I am personally uncomfortable with politicizing adoption.
titus2woman // 21 May 2007 at 8:29 am |
OH GIRL! This and the one on homeschooling below are wonderfully thought out, and I couldn’t agree more! God bless you! (((((HUGS))))) sandi
myderbe // 21 May 2007 at 9:00 am |
Julie, I agree. We’re not commanded to. I need to read that whole article.
And I also agree about not polticizing adoption. And I think that when people start adopting with some sort of agenda and because they think they’re doing the child a huge favor . . . well, I can see how that wouldn’t exactly make for a healthy family environment.
angela // 21 May 2007 at 3:04 pm |
Hi Julie,
I checked in on your blog and saw your article and just wanted to say I’m SO with you on this. I’ve always had a big respect for Focus on the Family but when I started hearing tid bits about this movement I was so very disturbed at how it was being presented. I would like to research it more and if we find that they are addressing it incorrectly then I think it would be great if we as adoptive families that really understand it can join together and contact them in love and see how we can redirect what is a worthy thing… Making people’s eye’s open to the beauty of adoption…but in the correct ways and because God has called those who he has called to adoption and not for any other reason. Until I read your article I did not realize that anyone else had these same concerns about this campaign as I do. I’ll research it and maybe some of us can come together and kindly and lovingly see if we can help them to understand.
Side note: I so can’t wait to hang out in Haiti with you!!!!
Much love, Angela
Momma Knows // 21 May 2007 at 9:09 pm |
First, Thanks for leaving me the comment on my blog!
And second, WOW I couldn’t agree more wholeheartedly with you than I do. Adoption should be entirely about and for a parent-child relationship. While I know the Bible views adoption favorably (as we are all adopted through our relationship with Christ), and even Moses was adopted! But adoption in itself should never be viewed as something to do to save someone. Viewed as such, it becomes a pride issue, I believe, and therefore done with wrong motives. We adopted two kids through fostering because we wanted to have two more kids and couldn’t the traditional way.
Adopting a child with special needs, ESPECIALLY prenatal substance abuse-related issues, is something to be approached with much prayer and PLANNING. You are absolutely correct when you say it costs much more than the adoption fees. It costs hours and hours of time spent in waiting rooms of speech therapists and occupational therapists, aching arms from holding the withdrawing baby all-night-long because he won’t let you sit down lest you stop MOVING, which calms him. It will grab your heart and take it places you never thought you’d willingly go, but you do. Over and over and over again. You can count on the fact that he’ll change YOU.
Michelle // 31 May 2007 at 8:34 pm |
That was an amazing, well-written entry!
I do believe that a lot of people go into adoption with misguided “save a child’ notions thinking that everything will be fine once the child is in their own home. (And just about every adoptive family I know has proven otherwise. As you said, these kids have delt with such harsh conditions in their short little pre-adoption lives.)
I agree with you. I think that adopting children for the sake of ’saving them’ is not realistic. But…once you have them, then as a parent it is our job to “train them up.” THAT is where the ’saving’ comes in, (although it’s not US that does the saving!)
Your children are blessed – because you LOVE them!
Michelle